Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikky Blond

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nikky Blond[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. Claimed award appears to be a token trade show honorific, given out only twice in the award's two-decade history. Even if it were seen as a technical PORNBIO pass, that would be far outweighed by the complete failure to meet GNG requirements. No nontrivial pertinent GNews or Gbooks hits. PROD removed without article improvement or guideline-based argument. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 16:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I conducted a good faith search and was unable to find significant coverage in any reliable, independent sources. One book looked promising but ended up being a reprint of this Wikipedia article and other Wikipedia porn star bios. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- no notability established. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.