Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Grahame (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was reluctant keep... _JD^talk 16:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nikki Grahame[edit]

Aside from the fact it's already been deleted once, after the first paragraph, which is mostly already in List of Big Brother housemates (UK series 7), it's just a list of appearances and gossip more akin to a fansite which never once fulfils her career description in the lead. SteveLamacq43 17:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the first time it was deleted the show was about 2 weeks old. It could do with a bit of a rewrite in places, but she is still notable. --Alex (Talk) 17:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep fronted her own television show so notable enough for her own article Gungadin 17:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable enough, per Gungadin. --Oakshade 18:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable enough before her on TV show. --badlydrawnjeff talk 12:01, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep own TV show, panel show appearances and National TV award i.e. notable SenorKristobbal 14:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge notable bits to List of Big Brother housemates (UK series 7); the list of appearances should definitely be deleted; no other articles have that, with good reason.HamishMacBeth 17:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - She had her own TV show.. MatthewFenton (talk · contribs · count · email) 23:56, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Good sourcing, and notable for that Princess Nikki show. Seems like kind of a useless person, but that's not grounds for deletion. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 02:05, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. She deserves her own article!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.219.235.211 (talk • contribs)
Keep.BUT It needs to be rewritten-theres alot of needless stuff here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hedphunk (talk • contribs)
Keep per the above commenters. Yamaguchi先生 06:39, 9 November 2006

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.