Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Grahame

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. — FireFox ^user_talk 13:30, 31 May '06

Nikki Grahame[edit]

Non notable Big Brother UK series 7 contenstant. — FireFox ^user_talk 12:13, 31 May '06 12:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete, only known for being a BB housemate. Sweetie Petie 12:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Big Brother UK series 7. --M e rovingian {T C @} 12:16, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as no Big Brother contestant should have their own page, and every other housemate AfD have been deleted. -- cds^(talk) 12:18, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't necessarily agree that no BB contestant is worthy of a page, as a handful have gone on to notable fame since leaving the house (whether as TV presenters, such as Brian Dowling and Craig Phillips, or simply through being Jade Goody); but certainly agree that the fame of current contestants isn't sufficient to justify their own page, and subsequent fame of course can't be judged at this stage. Delete, then, until she becomes adequately famous post-series. Which she won't. Seb Patrick 12:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 12:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep C'mon!! She is the most annoying thing ever and i need an outlet to vent my severe anger. Please? --MobberleyKirsty 12:49, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But Wikipedia is not a place to do that. --M e rovingian {T C @} 12:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aww! But please!! PLEASE!!!--MobberleyKirsty 12:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, the rest of the Internet should suffice. --M e rovingian {T C @} 12:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

www.blogger.com. I'm sure ireallyhatenikkioffbigbrother.blogspot.com must be available, right? ;-) Seb Patrick 12:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep . Er, yeah... Mikki rules!— Preceding unsigned comment added by MobberleyKirsty (talk • contribs)

Ha ha. See? Looks like you have more opposition than you think. Eh, Merovingian? --MobberleyKirsty 12:59, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The above two lines were written by MobberleyKirsty -- cds^(talk) 13:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll pay u five pounds to keep that information to yourself. ;-) --MobberleyKirsty 13:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm not even going to go there. --M e rovingian {T C @} 13:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as attack page. .:.Jareth.:. ^babelfish 13:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ok, then... four pounds. i see the game ur playing.--MobberleyKirsty 13:04, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This is not the place. I'm giving this AfD 25 minutes and if it hasn't received any more legit keep votes, the article is being speedied. — FireFox ^user_talk 13:06, 31 May '06

I think a {{deletedpage}} may be in order as well. --M e rovingian {T C @} 13:07, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then. i'll admit it. i only created this page to for my own ends. i think she's ugly and when she eats, reminds me of an eighty-year old man. Her jaw deserves a page of her own. But you goody-two-shoes "have a duty" to honour. I only wanted to show the world this... thing and expose her for the sham she is. and i would have gotten away with it if wasn't for you pesky kids. --MobberleyKirsty 13:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. blue520 13:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

delete cos shes a complete nobody Jamie 13:27, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.