Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Dial

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BD2412 T 03:35, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nikki Dial[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite my best efforts to improve coverage about pornographic actors in the wake of the pornography biography notability guidelines being deprecated, Nikki Dial does not pass WP:GNG. I spent time working on her article and found one poor quality interview from a non-mainstream porno review website and mere mentions about her elsewhere, everything else is a primary source from companies she has worked for or won awards from. Now, perhaps folks want to see winners of AVN Best Actress be inherently notable, but, at this point, Ms. Dial does not pass our general notability guidelines. Thanks for your reviews and assuming good faith in my efforts. Missvain (talk) 04:20, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:53, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:53, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:53, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:53, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:53, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:54, 16 January 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:56, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:56, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Was leaning towards keep based on the article content, then found a Google search was so thin I was questioning the verifiability of the entire article, cited sources aside. This is another one of these pre-internet era ones that could conceivably have decent coverage in reliable sources if someone had access to the right sources of that era. However, given that what is online is extremely poor, we've got nothing to show that anything more does exist, and I'm less confident that it might than some of the others I've already voted to delete, it needs deleting until and unless someone can come up with something better. The Drover's Wife (talk) 11:59, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable pornographic performer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination since subject fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC. -The Gnome (talk) 23:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I don't see where she has been involved in anime, either. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:29, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.