Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nik and Sam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:11, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nik and Sam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested speedy. I did some research on this group and notability looks plausible so I'm going to put it here to get more input. –BuickCentury Driver 17:51, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I spent about 5 minutes and found plenty of coverage in reliable sources, added some of it. Add the word 'music' (outside of the quoted "Nik and Sam") to the search above and you can find coverage easier. Dennis Brown (talk) 18:17, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And yes, the tone was terrible. I cleaned up a little, but it still needs more work. Those are issues of editing, not of notability. Dennis Brown (talk) 18:19, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.111.111.46 (talk) 19:21, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.