Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niiu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:12, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Niiu[edit]

Niiu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. A news aggregator app that lasted 18 months, shut down, restarted a couple of years later, then shut down again. Some of the refs look good but they are mostly based on launch publicity and coverage is not sustained. I haven’t been able to find anything that would take the notability tag off. Earlier PROD declined over notability. Mccapra (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 05:58, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The tagging for this was disrupted in the early 2010s though I tnink the tags have benn consistently in place since 2014. Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:05, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Non-promotional, seems written in good faith. Would give benefit of doubt unless you see some COI. Cheerio042 (talk) 20:09, 4 July 2019 (UTC) Striking blocked sock Britishfinance (talk) 10:46, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. AmericanAir88(talk) 14:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.