Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nihilanth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep: editors may merge as they see fit; such a proposed action does not require AfD. JERRY ^talk _contribs 04:14, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nihilanth[edit]

Delete or Merge into a "Half Life characters" or "Half Life bestiary" article. This article covers a subject not notable enough for an article. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 00:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. Fancruft of low importance to its own universe. I'd go for delete but don't see the point if the other articles are still around. Ham Pastrami (talk) 05:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary Merge. I'm conflicted on this one. On one hand, Ham is right in that he's currently not very important to its own universe (disagree on the 'fancruft' nonsense). On the other hand, it would not surprise me one bit if the character's importance is addressed in detail in the final third of HL2's episodic content. So I would say, merge the important parts (that the Nihilanth was the source of the HL1 disaster), but keep an open mind if there's enough new information from Episode 3 to re-warrant its own article. Scumbag (talk) 18:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm, I'm open to that. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 03:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, per Scumbag. - SigmaEpsilon → ΣΕ 15:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom tgies (talk) 06:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.