Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel H Seymour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:17, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nigel H Seymour[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's a huge amount of information about this singer, but it's all unsourced and I'm really struggling to find anything that isn't primary sources or user-generated. This person may well pass WP:MUSIC but I can't see it. Black Kite (talk) 14:11, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As I was tagging it, I had a gut feeling someone would follow up with an AfD... That being said, what I have found for this musician is his own official website (primary), ISBN 978-1-157-49693-9 "may" have useful information on him if someone has access. I'll try to see if I can find a copy next week. Those are the only two sources for him in particular. There may be other references to him by researching his works, but be careful with that because most of it may fall under WP:NOTINHERITED's "parent notability should be established independently; notability is not inherited "up", from notable subordinate to parent". Technical 13 (talk) 14:29, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That ISBN is for a book that "primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online", according to Google Books. Peter James (talk) 21:43, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ok, so I dug into some international press sources and cannot find anything that would help this individual meet either BLP or NMUSIC. The "article" reads like self-promotion, and in my mind (and based on research) that's all it is. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:53, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:06, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.