Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niculiţă Secrieriu
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation if notability can be established through reliable sources. The Bushranger One ping only 02:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Niculiţă Secrieriu[edit]
- Niculiţă Secrieriu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One blurb on a commercial website does not make for significant coverage in reliable sources. As such sources are lacking, notability is not established and the article should be deleted. - Biruitorul Talk 05:21, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:58, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete After a lengthy search over Romanian-language sites, all I see is that NS's name is being pushed around by a couple of commercial sites (themselves utterly marginal) and a news aggregator. It falls on the article to present better sources for its statements, or even for a modicum of notability - but it does not cite even one. Until someone shows up with at least one or two third-party RS(es), this entry is going bye-bye. Dahn (talk) 18:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Gongshow Talk 07:08, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bmusician 07:01, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.