Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Verkindt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:08, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Verkindt[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a biography of an unnotable person with extremely minor sources edited by one person Rizla (talk) 16:46, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Notability here, I think, rather stands or falls with those of GMA Cover Corp. and GlassFrog International Aid Organization. I'm not yet entirely convinced one way or the other, but I do note that all three articles have been mainly edited by the same person, who has not edited much else. PWilkinson (talk) 18:40, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I don't particularly believe executives of rather small private businesses deserve their own biographies, especially when the only sources are links to the organizations themselves, reverse links to the wikipedia article itself, twitter accounts and blogs and it contains extensive original research. 70.53.86.226 (talk) 02:30, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:28, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:BIO. some dubious sources in the article. 5 gnews hits rather than articles about her is not indepth coverage. [1]. LibStar (talk) 08:19, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.