Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Fisher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 03:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Fisher[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Resume-style fluffy entry based on primary sources. No proof of notability per GNG, no inherent notability in any of the alleged functions. Drmies (talk) 23:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion per comments made by Drmies. D🎉ggy54321 ^{(happy new year!)} 01:10, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Ran a search, there's nothing suggesting passage of WP:BIO, the results that I did find were mentions, non-independent coverage or non-RSs. Java Hurricane 08:41, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The article seems promotional and there is no clear evidence supporting WP:BIO / WP:GNG. — BarrelProof (talk) 00:48, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete an overly promotional article with no actual clear claim to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.