Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicola Fanucchi
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 15:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Nicola Fanucchi[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nicola Fanucchi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage about the subject. Couple of mentions and a press-release-like bio on a bunch of websites like 1, 2. Fails notability guidelines. Less Unless (talk) 11:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 11:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 11:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 11:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep complies with WP:BASIC has received widespread news/media coverage. Louie (talk) 12:41, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Louie Can you provide any of those? We need in depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. If you have found any - please add them here or directly into the article. Less Unless (talk) 20:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Less Unless please check if the updates are ok now and can you please reconsider to withdraw the nomination for deletion. Thks. Louie (talk) 22:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Louie, you have added a lot of sources - no doubt, but WP:GNG requires significant in depth coverage which lacks. There are couple sources that mention the subject as 'internationally appreciated' but where's the coverage? All the rest are just passing mentions. I'm sorry, but I still believe the article should be deleted. Best, Less Unless (talk) 13:05, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- I feel sorry that you think that way. I really think that the article complies with the minimum required WP:GNG and those are guidelines not absolute rules. Well, that is the way I perceive them. I have seen much, much worse articles being rescued. Anyway, I will stop adding info/sources for now as it might be just a waste of time, but I appreciate your honest feedback. Thks. Louie (talk) 19:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Louie, you have added a lot of sources - no doubt, but WP:GNG requires significant in depth coverage which lacks. There are couple sources that mention the subject as 'internationally appreciated' but where's the coverage? All the rest are just passing mentions. I'm sorry, but I still believe the article should be deleted. Best, Less Unless (talk) 13:05, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Less Unless please check if the updates are ok now and can you please reconsider to withdraw the nomination for deletion. Thks. Louie (talk) 22:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.