Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicodemus Abel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nicodemus Abel[edit]

Nicodemus Abel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find any notable contribution of the subject. The Reference cited are either primary sources (article written by the subject himself) or a press release about a conference where the subject given a lecture. Other references are from a private university website. Fails all WP:ACADEMIC criteria Educationtemple (talk) 08:31, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Philg88 talk 05:40, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Philg88 talk 05:40, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The employer profile (reference 2) is adequate for verifying the factual information in the article, but is not evidence of notability. I don't think the "best breeder" award is notable enough to count for WP:PROF#C2. This is likely a low-citation subject but even so Google scholar can only find one publication, with one citation, clearly not enough for #C1. And there seems to be no evidence of passing any of the other academic notability criteria. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:03, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:ACADEMIC, and is quite similar to Sivakumar Veerasamy (also at AfD). Miniapolis 21:08, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.