Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nico Slater

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – sgeureka ^t•c 10:47, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nico Slater[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor fictional characters that lack independent reliable sources to establish notability. Fail WP:GNG and WP:PLOT. Unlikely search terms and each character is already covered in a character list, so no merges or redirects are needed. The last of the minor Ugly Betty characters, all of which have been deleted at AFDs over the last few weeks. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 03:46, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. As Heidi Klum likes to say, "In fashion, one day you're in, the next day you're out." These characters were never in to begin with. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:43, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete normally it's best to merge fictional characters into lists, but these seem minor enough that that isn't necessary. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:41, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: What makes these unlikely search terms? None of them are disambiguated, and page view stats show that they're averaging 25-50 hits daily, so unless those are all from internal links, they're being searched for. Why would redirects to the relevant sections of List of Ugly Betty characters be inappropriate? Frickative 18:48, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: AFD nom not completed properly for names after Nico Slater, pages are tagged improperly. I don't have the time to fix it right this minute. Hairhorn (talk) 02:38, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Hairhorn (talk) 01:43, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no third-party sources exist that can WP:verifynotability. Shooterwalker (talk) 14:26, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.