Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nickola Shreli (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Previous article was a copyvio but this however seems fine so closing as keep (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nickola Shreli[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unfortunately the PROD was removed by Dream Focus so here we are at AfD and I'll say I confirm and echo what I said with my PROD "Searches found no better coverage aside from News and browsers and it obviously seems he is not a major or otherwise considerably notable actor with only background characters work. WP:TNT at best if a better article is ever available. NOTE: I would also likely disregard the AfD as it was closed immediately for speedy G12 and this current article was simply restarted within 24 hours." as there's simply nothing to suggest better notability and improvement.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As I stated "current article was recreated after old one was wiped out for being a copyright violation, not because they weren't notable". So the fact it was deleted before is not relevant here. Splash section of the Chicago Sun Times interviewed him [1], as did Regard Magazine [2]. These are both mentioned in the article already along with others providing he passes the General Notability Guildlines. Dream Focus 09:36, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Even if the article gets dropped, it will potentially be recreated soon. --Mondiad (talk) 17:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As Dream Focus says, the prior AfD ended quickly on copyright grounds, not on the merits. Sufficient coverage (notably including the Sun-Times) is already present to demonstrate he passes GNG. --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.