Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicklas Söderblom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:43, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nicklas Söderblom[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article about a personal trainer, actor, author, who has dated a famous person. I don't believe he meets any of the criteria in WP:BIO:

acting: he's been a bit part actor in a handful of tv show episodes
general celebrity: he's been interviewed a few times, including on the Tony Danza show; this doesn't seem at all enough to confer notability
dating: he was engaged to actress Nicollette Sheridan, but as Wikipedia:NOTINHERITED notes, notability isn't inherited
writing: apparently he wrote a book, but I can't find it (or him) in online booksellers like Amazon and Barnes and Noble
personal trainer: the article claims, but doesn't ref, that he's trained lots of famous people. I can't find a reliable source to back this up at all

So I don't believe that all of the above, when taken as a whole, shows that he's at all notable. Pretty much the only decently-refed thing about him is that he dated Sheridan, which is already in her article.

Note that the article was created by now-blocked user:Judo112, a sock of another account with a poor track record on BLPs. -- Finlay McWalter • Talk 00:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per NOTINHERITED. Minor acting role isn't sufficient, and neither is non-notable book authorship. The article mostly rests on him having dated a notable actor, which is neither here nor there. LotLE×talk 08:11, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per coverage in reliable sources over a 5-year period [1]. While yes, a lot of it refers to his failed relationship with Sheridan, the coverage is his and not hers, so the notability is not an inherited one. The BLP and Wikipedia will benefit from the article's expansion and better use of available sources... but not from deletion. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Unsure. If I had to take a guess, I guess I'd say this is non-notable, but I cannot read the sources cited by Michael Q Schmidt. It would be helpful if someone who speaks the language could comment on their veracity. JBsupreme (talk) 06:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:37, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.