Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick english

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. unsourced self-penned vanity page of a non-notable person Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:48, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nick english[edit]

Nick english (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced autobiography of a living person. The author's username, User:Nickenglishofficial, suggests obvious COI issues. CatcherStorm talk 05:48, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CatcherStorm talk 05:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CatcherStorm talk 05:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. CatcherStorm talk 05:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CatcherStorm talk 05:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. I cannot find independent in-depth coverage in reliable secondary sources - does not meet notability criteria. Citobun (talk) 05:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination - non-notable, no sources, self created promotion. Melcous (talk) 06:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Could even be speedied under A7, as the article makes no claim of importance. —teb728 t c 06:14, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.