Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Spencer (actor)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:38, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nick Spencer (actor)[edit]
- Nick Spencer (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. Does not meet criteria for notability according to WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Lack of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Cind.amuse 14:22, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Overruled!
if his acting in that show can be verified by a single reliable source (IMDB doesn't count), Delete otherwise.(Verified by the press release the Dru of id found.) --joe deckertalk to me 20:47, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Would this count? Dru of Id (talk) 05:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That verifies the content (e.g., it's reliable enough that I'd support the redirect), but as a press release, it's not "independent of the subject" (see the 4th bullet point at WP:GNG) and doesn't help demonstrate notability. --joe deckertalk to me 05:40, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Would this count? Dru of Id (talk) 05:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - very young, and not many credits to his name yet. Bob talk 09:29, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.