Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Luna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is clear consensus in this discussion that the subject currently lacks the significant coverage in reliable sources as is required by WP:GNG. TheSandDoctor Talk 14:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Luna[edit]

Nick Luna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run-of-the-mill presidential aide is not independently notable. Per WP:SIGCOV, "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail...Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention. KidAd talk 00:20, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Yeah, most sources come from covid testing. Will most likely not get coverage from her on. Le Panini (Talk tome?) 01:22, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.