Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Kristock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 19:52, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Kristock[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested with the comment I think this one is close enough to GNG that it should have a discussion. The sources listed are routine coverage which is insufficient of for WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:36, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:07, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Keep but notability and sourced. blaster talk! see 08:53, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 10:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Murry1975 (talk) 13:16, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:12, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:12, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - passes WP:NCOLLATH having won the Senior CLASS Award for soccer. Hack (talk) 13:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep clearly meets notability guidelines based on substantial coverage in reliable independent sources and for major award. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keepcomplies with WP:NCOLLATH guidelines as having won a national award and gained national media attention as an individual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buttons1992 (talk • contribs) 04:29, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - passes WP:NCOLLATH. Article needs work to show GNG pass more clearly. Fenix down (talk) 19:03, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 01:16, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The award kicks it passed WP:NCOLLATH requirements.LM2000 (talk) 03:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NCOLLATH ... and WP:GNG too it would appear. Nfitz (talk) 01:49, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.