Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Boragina

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Ryan Delaney ^talk 15:32, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Boragina[edit]

Non-notable nobody who hasn't even won an election. Delete. --File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 05:41, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I should also add that this is a vanity article, and violates the spirit of the policy on autobiographies. --File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 05:44, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I dont care. delete it if you want. Pellaken 06:41, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per page creator. --Alan Au 07:35, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy for user Pellaken or else delete as unsuccessful candidate who does not appear to be otherwise notable. Capitalistroadster 07:57, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Pellaken, the page creator. --GraemeL ^(talk) 12:02, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per page creator but suggest Pellaken having same/similar on his user page. Alf 12:22, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete--losing candidate for provincial legislature. Meelar (talk) 14:50, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
I seem to recall that Wikipedia strongly discourages people from writing articles about themselves, no matter how notable they may or may not be. On the other hand, current precedent is that anybody who's run as a candidate in any election can be included in a collated "list of X Party's candidates in Foo election" article. (I can't say I like it, but it is the currently-established practice.) Either userfy or, if somebody's feeling really ambitious, merge into a List of New Democratic Party candidates in the Prince Edward Island election, 2003. Bearcat 19:08, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just dont care. I could fight this, but I dont have the energy right now. Pellaken 12:37, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.