Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Beres

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 18:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Beres[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ineligible for PROD, has been PROD'd several times in the past (including twice by me because I have the apparent memory of a goldfish, mea culpa). Mr. Beres does not pass NJOURNALIST or the GNG. He is merely a man doing his job and while his job involves presenting the news, he has not been a subject of the news as an individual. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:32, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO despite a few mentions in local and trade press[1][2][3]. Nothing in-depth. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:08, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 08:03, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Train^talk 06:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.