Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Barrotta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Barrotta[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:ENT or WP:ANYBIO. The article relies heavily on imdb and the subject's own homepage nickybtv.com. This feels like a promotional article. FalconK (talk) 10:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 10:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 10:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:13, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:13, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:13, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:13, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Hmmm, it may meet NOTABLE but fails GNG.

–Cupper52^Discuss! 11:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, no worries. I will just update the sources. I will only use the more reliable ones. A. Julian 15:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

I just spent a while on the article to find better citations. I only ended up using IMDb for his Filmography section because Wikipedia's guide for citing IMDb states that it should be used "as a tertiary source for hard data on released films." In addition, I took out all citations referencing his personal website. Instead, I went through the whole article and found more articles about Mr. Barrotta on Fox, Divorce Court's website, and others. Now, every aspect of this article is cited appropriately. I take a lot of pride in my editing, so I will do anything to keep this page up. Thank you, happy new year. A. Julian 17:30, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Delete of his roles, at best 1 fits the criteria of being both significant and in a notable production. So he fails the relevant notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He is most certainly notable. Barrotta was a star on Divorce Court, and he currently has a recurring role on The Oval. In addition, he has modeled for three big magazines. In his profession, Barrotta is a person of interest. --A. Julian 00:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by A.JulianEditor (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.