Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Hender

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Non-notable as well as a possible conflict of interest. Image also deleted. —Dark ^talk 13:14, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Hender[edit]

Article seemingly created by the subject (account matches his stage name). Sources are his own web site and a biography he provided to the Australian Music Centre. An admittedly brief search turned up no third-party coverage. Dppowell (talk) 19:36, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree. Self-promotion worth of deletion.
Delete - there are no reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 21:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Canley (talk) 23:25, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - very much appears to be WP:COI problem. Fails WP:MUSIC. LonelyBeacon (talk) 00:02, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Poor attempt to create a resume online. Note to admin to please also delete the image. Yanksox (talk) 01:32, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, autobiography, does not meet the WP:MUSIC notability guidelines as far as I can tell. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete' non-notable composer Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.