Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niceties token

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Niceties token[edit]

Niceties token (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this was ever notable, and the website for the "movement" no longer works. Natureium (talk) 02:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:55, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - If I had managed to find another article to go along with the two already on the page, I would vote keep, albeit a weak one, on the grounds that the topic had sufficient reliable and significant coverage. However, I could only find one other article which was written by the founders, and doesn't help with notability ([1]). Maybe this information could be condensed into a blurb for the Fimo page, in a section for Related projects? The existing two sources look fine to use, even if one is currently dead. Yvarta (talk) 13:00, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Nothing indicating that this terribly ephemeral subject meets the GNG or any pertinent notability criteria. Ravenswing 00:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.