Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nguyên Đình

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:10, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nguyên Đình[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Fails WP:BIO. A search for sources comes up with namesakes. LibStar (talk) 00:07, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Vietnam. Shellwood (talk) 01:23, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A update tag was placed at 2015 no update made major problem is the title has namesakes. Although my decision is delete but the admin who will close this AFD can stand with draftify. @@@XyX _talk 01:39, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable diplomat. No sources establishing notability.—Mythdon (talk • contribs) 15:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ambassadors are not default notable, and the perfunctory coverage not really of this person, but of the head of state meeting with them in their office, covered because of what is represented, is not enough. I would say we have lots and lots of articles on non-notable ambassadors and have to do much to clean up this field, but I applaud this nomination as a start.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:39, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.