Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nguma Monene
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete as copyvio. --Ezeu 05:29, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nguma Monene[edit]
Subject material is "cryptozoological", which is the study of legends, or creatures that have not been proved to actually exist. I nominate for deletion as being unencyclopaedic, but others may disagree, hence why it is on AFD. Keep in mind that yes, while the Loch Ness Monster is strictly cryptozoological, it is a famous legend. I personally have not heard of this one. Kareeser|Talk! 01:47, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. If articles about Bigfoot and the Loch Ness monster are encyclopedic, so is this. Aplomado talk 01:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - Pulls up a few other hits on Google. Also has an article on the Polish 'pedia. Tijuana Brass¡Épa!-E@ 01:59, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as plagerism from the website it references. Every last word and word order identical. --Nick Y. 02:28, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Added a copyvio tag. Future votes should be based upon the past content, I suppose, although I don't know if it'll survive the copyvio process anyway. Doubt anyone will notice this one disappearing. Tijuana Brass¡Épa!-E@ 06:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup. --Terence Ong 11:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The book which is the source of the website which was the source of the article is about this phenomenon: Mokèlé-mbèmbé Perhaps merge? Sumergocognito 13:24, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable Hobbeslover 01:03, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete tagged as copyvio. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 05:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.