Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ngensolutions LLC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:42, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ngensolutions LLC[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is a claim to notability, explicated on the talk page, so A7 does not apply, and that is why I am taking this to AfD: the company is not notable by Wikipedia's standards; coverage in reliable sources is non-existent. Drmies (talk) 03:56, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't have sources to pass WP:GNG, fails WP:ORG. Bigger digger (talk) 15:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:49, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the references and it is notable as it owns television and radio stations in Reno, Nevada
- - Wikipedia doesn't really do the public interest, but thanks nonetheless. In response to your note on my talk page, the public interest of US citizens is not Wikipedia's primary concern. I note also that what you need to explain is how the company meets notability guidelines. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Those sources are press releases. It hasn't got independent sources so it can't possibly fit WP:GNG. --Enric Naval (talk) 10:52, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.