Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newkingdoms
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Coredesat 05:49, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Newkingdoms[edit]
An online video game. Doesn't assert notability, and doesn't appear to meet our notability standards. Lawrence Cohen 05:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:NOTE and WP:V. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:23, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete: web content that does not assert notability; will tag as such --Pak21 (talk) 10:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Any significance to the web content part of your comment? Or was it going to be a speedy for the general lack of not asserting notability? Lawrence Cohen 16:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- CSD A7 applies only to "an article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content" (my emphasis). --Pak21 (talk) 16:18, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Got it, thanks. I wasn't contesting it, or anything like that. I would have been happy with the Speedy or the AfD result. Of course I'd prefer for someone to drop ten or more reliable sources indicating notability here, but I don't think it will happen. Lawrence Cohen 17:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- CSD A7 applies only to "an article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content" (my emphasis). --Pak21 (talk) 16:18, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Any significance to the web content part of your comment? Or was it going to be a speedy for the general lack of not asserting notability? Lawrence Cohen 16:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 20:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Would qualify for speedy, too. Of the tiny amount of Ghits this gets, I looked up some, and none are reliable and nontrivial. User:Krator (t c) 13:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.