Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Town, Missouri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:50, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Town, Missouri[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails Wikipedia:GEOLAND. A suburban neighborhood of St. Charles, Missouri. Perhaps not typical in design, but otherwise unremarkable. Original article was highly promotional in tone. Grey Wanderer (talk) 23:55, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 00:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 00:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm new-ish to chiming in on these sorts of things, so I'm not sure of the etiquette here. How do I vote to support this article's deletion? The article is about a unique subdivision development and still has a promotional tone. I have recently discussed other issues on the article's talk page.--DiamondRemley39 (talk) 00:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey DiamondRemley, it was actually your comment on the talk page that inspired me to nominate it, something I’d considered doing for a while. I’ve edited your comment to indicate your opinion. If you want to input on other AfDs just use that same format. “Delete” could be replaced by “Keep” or “Merge” as you will see on other nominations. Thanks for your input! Grey Wanderer (talk) 00:17, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Grey Wanderer!--DiamondRemley39 (talk) 00:53, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note for the two of you: it is usually considered bad form to modify a discussion or talk page entry made by another person, even to correct it in minor ways and even if you know they "won't mind." If a person needs to fix their own entry, they are allowed to do so, but since we never can know exactly what another editor was thinking, we usually just point out the typo via their talk page and let them correct it, or not, as they see fit. That's all! A loose necktie (talk) 09:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.