Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Mobility Agenda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:23, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Mobility Agenda[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability; previously deleted via WP:PROD and restored. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:08, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:48, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:49, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:49, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. It is entirely possible that the topic itself is worthy of inclusion, and while the term appears to be used, I cannot tell from a cursory search how much this differs from, say, sustainable transport. Given the tone and next-to-nil sourcing, I cannot tell how much of the content is useful or relevant, which seems to make this a WP:TNT situation even if an article about it should exist. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is there a French name to the organization? References may be in French as well as in English. I haven't found a lot of coverage in English, although the organization's director has been quoted a lot in major newspaper publications like The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post. The organization itself has not been the focus of those article which largely about larger transportation issues. The only publication of note I found was by an environmental lobby group, but I'm not really sure if it could be considered independent: [1].4meter4 (talk) 13:44, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 16:53, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lord Roem ~ (talk) 02:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An extremely undersourced article / essay about an organisation and its wider area of concern. My searches are not finding better than copies of parts of the present article text - nothing meeting WP:ORGDEPTH criteria. I agree with the above comment by Kinu and another user's article Talk page concerns from 2008. Fails WP:NORG. AllyD (talk) 08:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete:I agree with the previous comments, this article fails notability and is written in such a way that if (and I might) all the unsourced material was removed it would be more of a non-notable stub.VViking_TalkEdits 14:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.