Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Hogtown Press

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:06, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Hogtown Press[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Under sourced and what is sourced seems to lack depth. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:44, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Organizations, Business, Companies, and Canada. UtherSRG (talk) 13:44, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable under the WP:GNG. Not sure why this was tagged and even less so why this was nominated. The nomination appears to be in conflict with WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP and something along the lines of wikipedia has no expiration date (sorry could not find it back so no link -- assistance appreciated!) gidonb (talk) 17:16, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 15:14, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 16:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think that the references are adequate. Being burgularized by the RCMP Security Service is a sign of notability. (sad face) Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sourcing is sufficient per WP:GNG. Sal2100 (talk) 19:46, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.