Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Economic Order (NEO)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 00:23, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
New Economic Order (NEO)[edit]
- New Economic Order (NEO) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
See WP:NOTESSAY. Ethanlu121 (talk) 00:14, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- I see that this article and Ross Honeywill were not bluelinked to one another. I've done so. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane2007 talk 01:56, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane2007 talk 01:56, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Like the recently deleted New economic order this is a overly promotional personal essay. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:09, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 00:38, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 00:38, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.