Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netscribes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:09, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Netscribes[edit]

Borderline spammy, and borderline notability, at best. Of the three references listed, two are press releases, and the third is a small article in a local paper. The third helps the situation, but IMHO does not establish notability by itself. TexasAndroid (talk) 01:46, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:46, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Has been covered by The Hindu Business Line, The Financial Express, The Times of India. Given that the first two are among the top three business newspapers in India and the third is the largest selling English newspaper in the world (per the Wikipedia page), I'd say it's notable enough. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 05:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Given how the author keeps re-inserting multiple links to their website and the content direction of the page, I'm inclined to think that before the end of this AfD, the page will go the G11 route. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 06:15, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Author has not given any reason why this organization is notable. The most detailed section is not about the business model, clients or revenues but about the branding and logo. Too promotional. --Deepak D'Souza 08:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not enough details on history. I saw no other reliable sources cited within the article. And I just got rid of some ad for this company from the author's userpage. Alexius08 (talk) 08:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Another one of them: a consulting and solutions firm. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:09, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:CORP, WP:RS. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article does not give any evidence of satisfying Corporation notability Porturology (talk) 13:16, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.