Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neriah Davis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 1994#March. (non-admin closure) — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:52, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neriah Davis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. NN Spartaz ^Humbug! 00:03, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:46, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 1994#March. Not much notability other than her Playboy gig. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 04:26, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is notability other than her Playboy gig; acording to the article, unlike similar models, this model has appeared in eleven films and television shows, most of which are notable (eight have their own articles), which largely took place before her appearance in Playboy. I researched and added one book reference to the article. Prhartcom (talk) 07:43, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A directory of porn actors is no more an indicator of notability than a telephone book would be, and the subject's film appearances are minor roles. So no, none of that pushes her towards meeting the project's notability threshold even an inch. Tarc (talk) 12:38, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete' - Subject's film roles are gems such as 19th billing in Meatballs 4, appearances in single episodes of tv shows, "uncredited", "manager", "plan girl", and so on. Being listed in a who's who porn directory book is irrelevant. Tarc (talk) 12:38, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as can't find any evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 13:22, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 1994#March per onel5969, Not sure why I !voted Delete but anyway it seems better to redirect than delete (and plus I !voted Redirect here so kinda makes sense too!). –Davey2010^Talk 15:50, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per onel5969. When I did much of the work four years ago in listifying the entries for minimally or non-notable playmates, I left some marginal articles in place for future decision. It's more than time for this one. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:43, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge & then Redirect to List_of_Playboy_Playmates_of_1994#March - Without having done a large amount lot of research on the subject under discussion here myself, there does not appear to be enough notability for a stand-alone article at this time. Guy1890 (talk) 05:42, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.