Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neotraditionalism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete and redirect. kingboyk 22:26, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neotraditionalism[edit]

Delete, Google yields almost no results for "neotraditionalism" in the article's context Joshuapaquin 05:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if verifiable. Otherwise, merge or delete as appropriate. I think I've heard this term before, in a valid context. Might want to check the blogosphere on that one.--み使い Mitsukai 05:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Some self-identifying neotraditionalist probably created this. Article has POV problems but not worth fixing because it appears to have no google hits in this context. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 07:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neodelete, neologism neocruft. NeoProto||type 12:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to New Urbanism. This term is an alternative term for New Urbanism. See A Critique of Neotraditionalism, "Dubbed "neotraditionalism," this new approach features...", and so forth --maclean25 00:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that seems appropriate. I agree. -Joshuapaquin 19:59, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.