Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neopostmodernism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neopostmodernism[edit]

I can't make heads or tails of this... is it WP:OR, WP:NEO, or just non-sense? Madcoverboy (talk) 05:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- Madcoverboy (talk) 05:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I invoke the xkcd argument: http://xkcd.com/451/ Merosonox t c g 06:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a neopostwikideletionist. JuJube (talk) 08:34, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a joke and encourage the editor to make positive contributions to WP since he or she seems to be intelligent and in need of things to do. :-) Northwestgnome (talk) 11:40, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly a joke: a seminal figure is a middle-aged Jewish man who lives in the center of the earth. A philosophical movement begun in the North Jersey suburbs? Something made up one day. RJC ^{Talk Contribs} 14:39, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a possible candidate for spam, Google shows rubbish basically --Numyht (talk) 20:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I see we don't have an article on 2024: A Graphic Novel by Ted Rall, which would be both funnier and a reasonable target for a redirect here.[1] Alternatively, since we don't have an article on The Interminable Gabberjabbs by Walter Hamady we could reasonably redirect to Walter Hamady#Gabberjabbs. In the long run, we might even end up with an article on the term as a IPC joke phrase for meaningless scholasticisms ... but that would take sources discussing the term as such. Regardless, the current content is useless, so delete. GRBerry 15:46, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.