Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neofeudalism controversy in United States politics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:32, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neofeudalism controversy in United States politics[edit]
- Neofeudalism controversy in United States politics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I see no evidence of any substantial "controversy" on this topic. There are only two sources cited here, one from Ludwig von Mises Institute and the other from FrontPage Magazine. I will leave it up to the rest of you to decide whether these are "reliable" sources, but regardless, this article smacks of original research and opinion which has no place on Wikipedia. Furthermore, the article is duplicative of much of what is already said in the neofeudalism article. Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 04:58, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:57, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:58, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This is just a POV fork. The only content that differs from the main article is the "Applications" section, which has no sources - pure OR. --Explodicle (T/C) 17:53, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with Explodicle that this is a POV fork. It is telling that the section of Neofeudalism that refers to this article as the main article on the subtopic is actually larger than the article it refers to. Drawn Some (talk) 20:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.