Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo-Gothic art movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neo-Gothic art movement[edit]

Non-notable group which seems to exist only to promote one artist (the twice-deleted Charles Moffat). All the links go to a website which attempts to position this as an art historical movement, but that website is a promotional vehicle for Moffat. As such, there are no other sources for this as an art movement. freshacconcispeaktome 17:21, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —freshacconcispeaktome 17:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless citations from reliable sources are provded to establish notability. Stifle (talk) 20:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I will change my !vote if references are forthcoming, but I don't see this as very likely since the movement doesn't exist outside of Moffat's promotional material and associated webrings. By the way I don't think the article is simply promoting Moffat, there's Stephanie Lynn Evans as well, although even her website just describes her work as gothic, which is merely an adjective, not an identification with an art movement. And then there's Floria Sigismondi, but I can't find any evidence that she is part of this so-called art movement.--Ethicoaestheticist 23:34, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. - Modernist 05:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.