Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neko Jump

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Listed for 25 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neko Jump[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable musical group WuhWuzDat 14:43, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are numerous foreign language sources available from both Japan and Thailand. I added one of them a few months ago. I don't speak the languages and google translate is pretty inadequate, so I didn't add the others, but there were multiple interviews with the band members in seemingly reliable sources. Clearly passes WP:NBAND since it "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself." Sailsbystars (talk) 15:07, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not to say the article couldn't use vast improvement..... Sailsbystars (talk) 15:12, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:28, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:21, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - If there was not already another vote with work done by Sailsbystars, I would call for Speedy Close because the nominator violated WP:JNN. Regardless, despite a shortage of sources in English there appears to be enough for a basic article, but the group might be better off on Thai or Japanese Wikipedia, because there seems to be a lot more available in those languages. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Note that on April 14 WuhWuzDat was banned from nominating articles for deletion, largely for not observing WP:BEFORE and other requirements of the AfD process. See this discussion at WP:ANI, though the ban took place after this particular nomination. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.