Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Taylor (journalist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Taylor (journalist)[edit]

Neil Taylor (journalist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, no additional sources on this specific person could be found (other than wikipedia mirrors). TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 03:30, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to solicit more opinions although it's hard to see a reason to keep unless more sources are located.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. His books C86 and All That and Document and Eyewitness received plenty of coverage, as has his role in compiling the C86 compilation: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. --Michig (talk) 13:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:00, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:11, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Unlike Michig I am unimpressed by the links, above, as well as those I came across. The articles above have only mentions of Taylor and of his books. I found no reviews of the books, and all of 13 ratings on Amazon of "Document and Eyewitness". It's listed as "#10,070 in Rock Music (Books)". He gets a name-check in articles about C86 and its redo, but not enough for BIO. Lamona (talk) 01:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You say you "found no reviews of the books" - three of the links I listed above are reviews of his books. --Michig (talk) 09:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You are right (at least 2 of them, one I cannot access - FT). I was looking in standard book sources. Other than FT, which I have to take on faith, the other two are Record Collector and Louder Than War. Both are quite brief, and I doubt if those would be enough to establish notability for the book. However, they clearly do not establish notability for the author. Lamona (talk) 16:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.