Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neha Thakar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neha Thakar[edit]

Neha Thakar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist.I de-prodded it myself per User talk:Winged Blades of Godric#Neha Thakar. Winged Blades Godric 15:24, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Winged Blades Godric 15:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Winged Blades Godric 15:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 15:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – Per source searches, the depth of coverage about the subject does not appear to meet WP:BASIC at this time, and not finding evidence of WP:ARTIST being met. The subject has received some coverage, such as this and this mention in Hindustan Times and two short paragraphs of coverage in this Indian Express article, but not finding much else. If additional sources are found, feel free to ping me to this discussion. North America1000 02:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 23:24, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not enough coverage to show passing of notability guidelines for artists.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:58, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.