Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Necroholocaust
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 02:36, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Necroholocaust[edit]
- Necroholocaust (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
All of the information in the article seems to be true, but it doesn't seem to meet any of the notability criteria laid out at WP:MUSIC; that is to say, they haven't won any music awards, they haven't got any best selling albums, and they haven't been covered by independent media sources as far as I can tell. If my understanding is correct, this means we should not have an article about them. —Soap— 00:43, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails notability guidelines. Googled name. Couldn't find any substantial source. Article itself lacks sources. YouTube cannot be considered a source. BejinhanTalk 13:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:BAND. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:36, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 17:30, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.