Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neang Neath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 21:36, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neang Neath[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD was contested, no explanation was given. I will notify de-prodding editor. I brought the article here because WP:PROD says not to re-prod the article. My original reason was that it does not appear to pass WP:NFILM. Tim1357 (talk) 22:47, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment/Weak Delete -- At this time, I would weakly support the deletion nomination due to there being no sources that demonstrate whether this film meets WP:NFILM. However, I wonder if this is a language bias, given that this film is a Cambodian film? There are a number of Google hits, even if you exclude WP mirrors. I don't think the hits meet WP:RS, but I think it is an indication that there might be other, reliable sources out there supporting notability. Singularity42 (talk) 18:41, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is nothing to suggest that this meets WP:NFILM Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 00:28, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails notability guideline for films. JBsupreme (talk) 00:30, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 03:16, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I think this should be directed to a SE Asia WikiProject for someone to confirm that this film is not notable. Maybe some of the above editors know Khmer, but I certainly do not. - BalthCat (talk) 07:13, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.