Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazakhtar Nikakhtar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:28, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nazakhtar Nikakhtar[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article is an Assistant Secretary in the Department of Commerce. She appears to have received only passing mentions in the major press. This is another one of the articles created on minor Trump Administration bureaucrats by @Biografix:. Fiachra10003 (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 15:00, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:06, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While the 5 under secretaries are probably all notable, Nikakhatar is one of 3 assistant secretaries under one of those 5 under secretaries, that is a step too far for default notability, and nothing else here shows notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:40, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. -The Gnome (talk) 10:48, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. No default notability, no major coverage. Tillerh11 (talk) 19:58, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete TOOSOON, fails GNG.^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:50, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Too soon, will possibly be notable in the future but we'll see plus needs more sources anyway. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 00:33, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.