Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naxalbari National Heritage Academy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Naxalbari. ~ mazca talk 12:37, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Naxalbari National Heritage Academy[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- " Naxalbari National Heritage Academy" (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No assertion of notability, seems to be a mission statement/promotional pamphlet. SGGH ping! 16:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @751 · 17:01, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I searched on Google News Archive, but didn't find anything on this organization. -- Eastmain (talk) 16:31, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as Eastmain says, all the hits on Google are wiki hits, and there are no hits on Google News. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 19:03, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I have moved the link to their website to External links, corrected the unref tag, and moved the article to the same name without the quotation marks. This is not an indication that I think it should be kept (see my vote above), but just to tidy up what is there. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 19:05, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 00:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 00:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It's a school in Darjeeling district in West Bengal, India, which appears to include the high school grades, based on the subjects that it appears to teach (see list at http://www.destinyweddings.co.uk/abhik/html/about.htm ). -- Eastmain (talk) 00:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - has been shown to include a high school. Indian schools traditionally have a poor Internet presence and, to avoid systemic bias, time should be given for local sources to be found. TerriersFan (talk) 00:51, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Keep--- Guess what? The English Wikipedia is not the American Wikipedia of North America. We can't say keep an American high school and then discard this school is called "bias" and called it crap. Why we waste time in this type of discussion?, what ever happened to the "sum of all human knowledge". GO my wikipedia friend and create an article about a high school in China, Thailand, Tibet and lets stop this boring time consuming discussions. --J.Mundo (talk) 01:12, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This isn't a high school, not yet, per this, only upto Grade 4. Given that it's a primary school, and doesn't meet WP:GNG, it's a delete. An alternative is to add a primary schools section to List of educational institutions in West Bengal and redirect there, but I'm not too keen on that. -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 01:45, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Redirect per TerriersFan below, since it's convention. -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 18:20, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect to Naxalbari. I stand corrected. The roadmap for the school's development is here. Consequently, established practice is to merge the page to its locality from where it can be broken out again if/when it reaches high school status. However, I stand by my comment that we need to avoid systemic bias as also emphasised by J.Mundo. If this was an anglosphere school it would be routinely merged and I see no reason to differ from this for Asian schools. TerriersFan (talk) 02:39, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.