Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nawras Abu Saleh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Not the most policy-based consensus, but the outcome is clear. Also nom is indeed blocked. (non-admin closure) czar · · 03:52, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nawras Abu Saleh[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person only have a source to IMDB which is not that great of a reliable source, Plus, one role is not enough to be in Wikipedia. Ghostboy1997 (talk) 18:13, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 00:07, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 02:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, if you google the name in Arabic, you find quite a lot of different media having interviewed him or covered news about his work. --Soman (talk) 11:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -weak article, and needs a lot of work. Does it fail notability? Not really. Quite a bit of foreign-language coverage. Cheers, Λuα ^{(Operibus anteire)} 06:24, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note:nominating editor has been blocked recently on account of being a sock. Just throwing it out there. Cheers, Λuα ^{(Operibus anteire)} 06:25, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.