Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navitaire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn j⚛e decker ^talk 19:54, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Navitaire[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This subsidiary of Accenture should be redirected to the parent company because there is no indepth coverage in multiple independent reliable sources as required by the WP:GNG. A WP:SPA has twice resurrected the article from a redirect and once removed a PROD. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:47, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: While I agree that the current version of the Navitaire article is not well-supported by sources and understand why you've nominated it for deletion, I'm actually working right now on a much improved draft for the article. The draft cites around 28 independent sources. Basic information about the company is cited to Bloomberg and to this CAPA profile. This industry article goes in depth about airline passenger service systems, including Navitaire, which the article makes clear is a major player in its market. Other sources include this article on Navitaire's capabilities, this one and this one on its software, New Skies, and this article noting Navitaire's win at the Budgies World Low Cost Airlines Awards. As I am working on this on behalf of Accenture, I won't make any edits to the live article. Instead, I was planning on presenting my new draft for editors to review and take live if it looks ok in the next few weeks. I'd like to suggest waiting on a deletion decision until I've been able to finish and propose my new draft. That way editors can see what they think based on a more robustly written and sourced version. Would that be possible? Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 15:34, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've been able to get my draft finished up and given the go-ahead by the folks at Navitaire today, so here's the link to the draft in my user space: User:16912_Rhiannon/Navitaire Does this draft work to show the article can be retained? Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 18:34, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:49, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:49, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:50, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw nomination in favour of User:16912 Rhiannon/Navitaire. I've tweaked the lede somewhat. Closer please replace old article with new draft. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.