Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NavaShield

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NavaShield[edit]

NavaShield (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, fails WP:NSOFT and WP:NPRODUCT all sources I could find were "removal" sites as well as YouTube videos and the like. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I couldn't turn up any reliable sources either. Not every malware is going to be notable. Fails notability guidelines. FuriouslySerene (talk) 23:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note This was previously PROD deleted in 2012. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking significant independent coverage. A search turned up only how-tos and forum posts, no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 15:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.