Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NavCIS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NavCIS[edit]

No reliable sources support the notability of this software. No improvements to the article in three years. Ghits on topic are ambiguous. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 13:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What about [1] [2] ? Compuserve Nagivator (the article states this as an alternate name for NavCIS) is certainly notable, if you remember paying $20/hr for CI$ access, back before people got into the internet, and instead had BitNet and MCImail accounts. 76.66.196.229 (talk) 08:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a Keep BTW. There are something like 40 books written on this subject (atleast partially) 76.66.196.229 (talk) 05:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:04, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep: Please. This program is clearly notable based on availible sources and historical significance. Wikipedia does not have deadlines, if it is unsourced but can be sourced, it doesn't merit deletion. Keep, there is no issue here that five seconds on Google can't solve. Jo7hs2 (talk) 05:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The Ghits are ambigious because the name changed. Try "Compuserve Navigator" instead. Jo7hs2 (talk) 05:22, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.